GREAT PYRAMID 9/10:
In the model of the Great Pyramid I'm proposing (based on the Human Original Canon = Man in T = 1'80 m) I found a relationship 9/10 that it was also proposed by Herz-Fischler in 2000. See below:
http://metrologiahistorica.blogspot.com.es/2017/11/great-pyramid-slope-5184-gran-piramide.html
But this morning I found another very curious relationship. I want to put it here now.
Whith this model (9/10) we don't have just the right lenghts and angles of the Great Pyramid.
We have maybe also a way for squaring the cercle in a practical approximative way.
SQUARING THE CIRCLE?
By squaring the circle here I means that we have a circumference with the same lenght of a square:
Perimeter of square = Side of square x 4 --> Circumference = 2 x Pi x Radius.
In the model 9/10 we have:
- Perimeter of Big square (20 x 20) = 20 units x 4 = 80 units.
- Diagonal of quarter (9 x 9) = Root of 162 = Radius.
- Circumference = 2 x Pi x Radius = 79'9718931 units = 80 units
So we have almost the same lenght for the perimeter of the square and the circumference.
PD 1: I did also a graphical explanation. But my scan doesn't work this morning. So this image was taken with my smartphone and it's not very clear. Sorry about that. I will put a better image when my scan will work:
PD 2: So we have:
Side Squ = 8 Pletrons = 400 Royal cubits (32 Fingers 1’8 cm = 57’60
cm) = 230’40 m.
Perimeter Square = 4 x 8 Pletrons = 4 x 230’40 m = 921’60 m = 92160 cm.
Circumference = 921’60 m = 92160 cm.
If we take a 360 degree circle we will have:
If we do 92160 cm / 360 each degree is 256 cm. Very near to 10 Natural foot
(25’65 cm).
But what if we take a 400 degree circle?
If we do 92160 cm / 400 each degree is 230’40 cm. Exactly 4 Royal Cubits
(32 Fingers).
Conclusion:
So, with this model we have a simple relationship between linear measures
and circular measures in the ancient system of measures. I think that can not
be the result of chance.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario