VITRUVIAN MAN: Cubit = 45 mm. Hand = 18 mm. So, Man = 1'80 m.
Cubit = 45 mm:
Cubit is 1/4 of the Man. Cubit is 45 mm. > Cubit is 45 cm. So, Man = 1'80 m.
Hand = 18 mm:
Hand is 1/10 of the Man. Hand is 18 mm. > Hand is 18 cm. So, Man = 1'80 m.
La Metrología Histórica es la ciencia que estudia la historia de las medidas. Estudia muy especialmente las medidas antiguas. Es un campo de investigación complicado ya que en Metrología Histórica reina una gran confusión. Mi trabajo de investigación propone una solución a dicha confusión. La solución está basada en la reconstrucción del Sistema de Medidas Antiguo cuya unidad central corresponde a un Hombre de 1´80 m.
sábado, 2 de diciembre de 2017
GREAT PYRAMID 9/10: SQUARING THE CIRCLE?
GREAT PYRAMID 9/10: SQUARING THE CIRCLE?
GREAT PYRAMID 9/10:
In the model of the Great Pyramid I'm proposing (based on the Human Original Canon = Man in T = 1'80 m) I found a relationship 9/10 that it was also proposed by Herz-Fischler in 2000. See below:
http://metrologiahistorica.blogspot.com.es/2017/11/great-pyramid-slope-5184-gran-piramide.html
But this morning I found another very curious relationship. I want to put it here now.
Whith this model (9/10) we don't have just the right lenghts and angles of the Great Pyramid.
We have maybe also a way for squaring the cercle in a practical approximative way.
SQUARING THE CIRCLE?
By squaring the circle here I means that we have a circumference with the same lenght of a square:
Perimeter of square = Side of square x 4 --> Circumference = 2 x Pi x Radius.
In the model 9/10 we have:
Conclusion:
GREAT PYRAMID 9/10:
In the model of the Great Pyramid I'm proposing (based on the Human Original Canon = Man in T = 1'80 m) I found a relationship 9/10 that it was also proposed by Herz-Fischler in 2000. See below:
http://metrologiahistorica.blogspot.com.es/2017/11/great-pyramid-slope-5184-gran-piramide.html
But this morning I found another very curious relationship. I want to put it here now.
Whith this model (9/10) we don't have just the right lenghts and angles of the Great Pyramid.
We have maybe also a way for squaring the cercle in a practical approximative way.
SQUARING THE CIRCLE?
By squaring the circle here I means that we have a circumference with the same lenght of a square:
Perimeter of square = Side of square x 4 --> Circumference = 2 x Pi x Radius.
In the model 9/10 we have:
- Perimeter of Big square (20 x 20) = 20 units x 4 = 80 units.
- Diagonal of quarter (9 x 9) = Root of 162 = Radius.
- Circumference = 2 x Pi x Radius = 79'9718931 units = 80 units
So we have almost the same lenght for the perimeter of the square and the circumference.
PD 1: I did also a graphical explanation. But my scan doesn't work this morning. So this image was taken with my smartphone and it's not very clear. Sorry about that. I will put a better image when my scan will work:
PD 2: So we have:
Side Squ = 8 Pletrons = 400 Royal cubits (32 Fingers 1’8 cm = 57’60
cm) = 230’40 m.
Perimeter Square = 4 x 8 Pletrons = 4 x 230’40 m = 921’60 m = 92160 cm.
Circumference = 921’60 m = 92160 cm.
If we take a 360 degree circle we will have:
If we do 92160 cm / 360 each degree is 256 cm. Very near to 10 Natural foot
(25’65 cm).
But what if we take a 400 degree circle?
If we do 92160 cm / 400 each degree is 230’40 cm. Exactly 4 Royal Cubits
(32 Fingers).
Conclusion:
So, with this model we have a simple relationship between linear measures
and circular measures in the ancient system of measures. I think that can not
be the result of chance.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)